From: Andreas Ziegler <br025@umbiko.net>
To: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>, buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] boot/syslinux: Bump to 6.04-pre2
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 04:54:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <45a821b584840d1cabe6df1dfe083fb8@umbiko.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e34f4a3f8aaee192923e3ecdde4a287a1cfaabda.camel@gmail.com>
Hi Alexander, Thomas, Everyone,
On 2026-10-26 20:45, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Sun, 2026-10-25 at 21:36 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2026 at 12:08:44AM +0200, Alexander Sverdlin wrote:
>> > The revision to build comes from Archlinux syslinux package, the archive
>> > from debian (to save time for git clone).
>> >
>> > Add patch fixing passing &load_error_buf to setjmp()/longjmp(), rejected
>> > since gcc 14 made -Wincompatible-pointer-types an error by default.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
>>
>> Does it make sense to keep syslinux? Even Wikipedia says it's
>> "discontinued". Do you still use it?
>
> I'll be fine having it downstream. I just thought, there is still an
> interest [1] in this update ;-)
Yes, there is still interest in this software, and I sadly mourn the
absence of the don't-delete-host-syslinux patch. I did not reply
earlier, because Thomas already did a deep dive.
Just some formal things:
You might take a look at the output of check-package:
$ utils/check-package boot/syslinux/*
boot/syslinux/0005-lzo-Use-the-host-toolchain-for-prepcore.patch:0:
missing Upstream in the header
(https://nightly.buildroot.org/#_additional_patch_documentation)
boot/syslinux/0011-extlinux-Use-the-host-toolchain-to-build.patch:0:
missing Upstream in the header
(https://nightly.buildroot.org/#_additional_patch_documentation)
boot/syslinux/0013-Fix-build-with-gnu-efi-version-3.0.9.patch:0: missing
Upstream in the header
(https://nightly.buildroot.org/#_additional_patch_documentation)
boot/syslinux/0014-Fix-build-with-binutils-note-gnu-property-section.patch:0:
missing Upstream in the header
(https://nightly.buildroot.org/#_additional_patch_documentation)
boot/syslinux/0016-Workaround-multiple-definition-of-symbol-errors.patch:0:
missing Upstream in the header
(https://nightly.buildroot.org/#_additional_patch_documentation)
boot/syslinux/0017-Replace-builtin-strlen-that-appears-to-get-optimized.patch:0:
missing Upstream in the header
(https://nightly.buildroot.org/#_additional_patch_documentation)
1137 lines processed
6 warnings generated
These should either be added to the .packageignore file or a "Upstream:
N/A, dead" line, similar to
0023-com32-chain-chain.h-use-proper-type-in-struct-data_a.patch:21.
A few of the existing patches should be rebased for 6.04, they do not
apply cleanly:
>>> syslinux bf6db5b4 Patching
<...>
Applying 0011-extlinux-Use-the-host-toolchain-to-build.patch using
patch:
patching file extlinux/Makefile
Hunk #2 succeeded at 53 (offset 1 line).
Applying 0013-Fix-build-with-gnu-efi-version-3.0.9.patch using patch:
patching file mk/lib.mk
Hunk #1 succeeded at 188 (offset 2 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 198 (offset -5 lines).
<...>
Applying 0016-Workaround-multiple-definition-of-symbol-errors.patch
using patch:
patching file com32/cmenu/Makefile
patching file com32/elflink/ldlinux/Makefile
patching file com32/gpllib/Makefile
patching file com32/hdt/Makefile
patching file core/Makefile
Hunk #1 succeeded at 158 (offset -6 lines).
patching file dos/Makefile
patching file efi/Makefile
Hunk #1 succeeded at 71 (offset 1 line).
<...>
Kind regards,
Andreas
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/aq62x3ovAUoc_Lmn@windsurf/
>
> --
> Alexander Sverdlin.
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@buildroot.org
https://lists.buildroot.org/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-24 22:08 [Buildroot] [PATCH v2] boot/syslinux: Bump to 6.04-pre2 Alexander Sverdlin
2026-10-25 20:36 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2026-10-26 20:45 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-10-27 4:54 ` Andreas Ziegler [this message]
2026-10-27 5:57 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-10-27 8:20 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2026-10-27 15:12 ` Lance Fredrickson
2026-10-27 8:19 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2026-10-28 4:48 ` Andreas Ziegler
2026-10-29 20:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
2026-10-27 8:15 ` Thomas Petazzoni via buildroot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=45a821b584840d1cabe6df1dfe083fb8@umbiko.net \
--to=br025@umbiko.net \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com \
--cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox