From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tom <fivemiletom@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 12:16:10 -0700
Subject: [Buildroot] BR2_STAGING_DIR config?
In-Reply-To: <20070531164543.GA22322@aon.at>
References: <465EF8D5.30902@gmail.com> <20070531164543.GA22322@aon.at>
Message-ID: <465F1EFA.3090403@gmail.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Thanks.

 From the systems I use, 3.4 could be dropped: Fedora Core 6 comes with 
4.1.1 and Cygwin is (soon?) to upgrade from 3.4.4 to 4.2.0.

Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 09:33:25AM -0700, Tom wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I want to use the cross development toolchain also for other projects 
>> and thus defined:
>> BR2_STAGING_DIR="/tw/tools/gnu/cygwin/arm-linux"
>>
>> However, I am getting this error in libutils, what am I missing please?
> 
> I was looking into toolchains that can be moved around to other machines
> without problems.
> See the archives, thread
> Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [patch] sysroot support in toolchain,
>         use correct pathes in staging_dir
> 
> for details.
> The last patch is here:
> http://uclibc.org/~aldot/buildroot.mine.cow.20070515-1321.diff.bz2
> 
> But i am hesitating to fix this, since the outdated, deprecated gcc-3.4
> series will break with these changes (and i didn't see yet how to fix
> that without touching this ancient gcc, which i refuse to do).
> 
>>>From my POV, it would be fine to discontinue gcc-3.4, not sure what
> people think about this, though.
> 
> HTH,
>