From: Ivan Kuten <ivan.kuten@promwad.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] is netkit-base-0.17 needed at all?
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 02:45:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4711587D.4010008@promwad.com> (raw)
Hello,
While reviewing package list I noticed netkit-base.
Is it needed at all? Seems to me it completely outdated by inetd and ping from busybox!
Any reason to keep it at all or mark as outdated?
Best regards,
Ivan
--------------------------------
Embedded Linux engineer,
Promwad Company: http://www.promwad.com/
Homepage : http://www.ivankuten.com/
--------------------------------
reply other threads:[~2007-10-13 23:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4711587D.4010008@promwad.com \
--to=ivan.kuten@promwad.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox