From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ivan Kuten Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 21:30:37 +0300 Subject: [Buildroot] Busybox minicom-like application? In-Reply-To: <1193180356.5708.1.camel@aeglos.sweden.atmel.com> References: <6090c5eb0710231132k5146e947r48e3deeedc4b7599@mail.gmail.com> <471E5044.7020003@promwad.com> <6090c5eb0710231152r5cc500begf381537fad9efa0b@mail.gmail.com> <471E53BA.5060401@promwad.com> <20071023224556.GA18766@cloud.net.au> <1193180356.5708.1.camel@aeglos.sweden.atmel.com> Message-ID: <471F8F4D.6050202@promwad.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Ulf Samuelsson wrote: > ons 2007-10-24 klockan 08:45 +1000 skrev Hamish Moffatt: >> Jorge S. wrote: >>> Yes, i know its there, but it gets HIDDEN when i select the "[*] Hide >>> applications that are provided by busybox". >>> >>> Maybe there's a buildroot bug here? >> busybox in SVN does have a microcom applet, as of four weeks ago. The >> latest change to package/Config.in takes that into account. >> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 11:04:10PM +0300, Ivan Kuten wrote: >>> Indeed, >>> >>> see Config.in >>> >>> if !BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_HIDE_OTHERS >>> source "package/microcom/Config.in" >>> endif >>> > > I do not think that is a good idea to hide it until > it is in the mainstream busybox. > OK, I will "unhide" it, and if microcom applet will be in busybox mainline then hide again. BR, Ivan -------------------------------- Embedded Linux engineer, Promwad Company: http://www.promwad.com/ Homepage : http://www.ivankuten.com/ --------------------------------