From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ivan Kuten <ivan.kuten@promwad.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2008 19:23:19 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] The target/device/Atmel mess
In-Reply-To: <d6cda7730801080744g579c2d19wc1fb16b76ff431ee@mail.gmail.com>
References: <d6cda7730712241147g3e1edd25jcc11fcece24e4ec9@mail.gmail.com>	<d6cda7730801040506h364041e7l5c58d90c3c708d6f@mail.gmail.com>	<028d01c85141$ba1a0290$030514ac@atmel.com>	<d6cda7730801070923n74d20a21k6d5a1205c2592dbf@mail.gmail.com>
	<d6cda7730801080744g579c2d19wc1fb16b76ff431ee@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4783B187.9000008@promwad.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Thiago A. Corr?a wrote:
>> I have named the folder arch-avr32/kernel-patches-2.6.23
>> Should it be kernel-patches-2.6.23.0?
>> Usually the same patch applies to all minor versions, (ie: 2.6.22.0 to
>> 2.6.22.10), how does one express that?
> 
> Replying to myself, yes, it should be called kernel-patches-2.6.23.0
> to apply. The other issues are still open though, such as the
> apparently unused Linux folder :(
> 
> Ulf, anyone?
> 
> Kind Regards,
>    Thiago A. Correa
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at uclibc.org
> http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot


Hi Thiago,

As I understood target/device/Atmel/Linux directory should be removed, right?

BR,
Ivan