From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joe Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2008 09:44:42 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Flash for AT91RM9200 In-Reply-To: <039401c895a7$61f39304$85f0af0a@corp.atmel.com> References: <039401c895a7$61f39304$85f0af0a@corp.atmel.com> Message-ID: <47F5DC6A.4060001@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Samuelsson, Ulf schrieb: > If you are starting a design > now,You should perhaps > consider the AT91SAM9260 > or the AT91SAMG20 Thanks Ulf! I know the RM9200 is more a One-of-a-kind design and has numerous errata.. but does this imply that it will be eventually discontinued in the near future? I'm not really on a new design, so changing CPUs would be really painful if necessary. But changing now is surely better than having to change fast in 6 months f.e., if the RM9200 is discontinued. Do you maybe have some insight into the lifecycle of the RM9200 and can possibly shed some light on this? Thanks very much, Joe -- Sepp "ZaP" Holzmayr please reply to: zentrale.at.work at gmail.com "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a freight train full of DAT tapes. Only the round-trip is a little suboptimal."