From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andreas Kuehn Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:38:29 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] kernel image size depends on toolchain? In-Reply-To: <87hcc0pfrr.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <484F8157.2050902@gin.de> <87hcc0pfrr.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <484F8F05.2040105@gin.de> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net That is how I found that thing. It simply doesn't fit into my boot flash anymore. And Yes, it is the same, not even a copy, .config file for both trys. The reason why I need the "new" uclibc is, that I need access to the PIOs of my at91sam9261 and at91sam9263 controllers. And the "old" uclibc has this mmap bug that creates an page overflow error. Is there a chance that something in the uclibc like the LARGEFILESUPPORT creates some static or incompressable data block? Peter Korsgaard wrote: >>>>>> "Andreas" == Andreas Kuehn writes: > > Hi, > > Andreas> Created: Tue Jun 10 11:45:43 2008 > Andreas> Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed) > Andreas> Data Size: 4528112 Bytes = 4421.98 kB = 4.32 MB > > Andreas> With an old toolchain I can achive regular sizes: > > Andreas> Created: Tue Jun 10 13:44:26 2008 > Andreas> Image Type: ARM Linux Kernel Image (uncompressed) > Andreas> Data Size: 1412792 Bytes = 1379.68 kB = 1.35 MB > > Strange. And you are sure you're using the exact same kernel config? > Do both kernel images boot? >