From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hinko Kocevar Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:40:22 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] GIT or SVN In-Reply-To: <20080620083646.GB12682@mx.loc> References: <485A3396.80701@cetrtapot.si> <87iqw5dyyb.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20080620083646.GB12682@mx.loc> Message-ID: <485B6CF6.7040901@cetrtapot.si> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Bernhard Fischer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 09:09:00PM +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >>>>>>> "Hinko" == Hinko Kocevar writes: >> Hinko> Hello, >> Hinko> I'm new to the uclibc buildroot. I've noticed that there are >> Hinko> two repositories: GIT and SVN. GIT looks more up2date. Is GIT >> Hinko> the tree to use? >> >> It depends ;) Bernhards git tree is more uptodate regarding toolchain, >> but the svn tree has more/newer packages and more developers. > > Exactly. I basically ignore packages completely, apart from the, let's > say 5-10 that i actually use or find useful. I've been looking for recent gcc for the cris arch as I was seeing gcc internal errors when compiling kernel or openssl source with gcc 4.2.3 or 4.2.4. With gcc 4.3.1 gcc internal errors went away, so I'm really glad I found the GIT tree! -- ?ETRTA POT, d.o.o., Kranj Planina 3 4000 Kranj Slovenia, Europe Tel. +386 (0) 4 280 66 03 E-mail: hinko.kocevar at cetrtapot.si Http: www.cetrtapot.si