From: Anders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@control.lth.se>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_CONFIG and Atmel targets
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2008 08:47:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48F2EF1B.70102@control.lth.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081013081228.14f1e6c7@hcegtvedt>
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Oct 2008 12:16:24 +0200
> Anders Blomdell <anders.blomdell@control.lth.se> wrote:
>
>> in target/device/Atmel/atngw100/Makefile.in there is a line
>>
>> BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_CONFIG:=$(BOARD_PATH)/busybox-1.9.1.config
>>
>> unfortunately this makes it impossible to change busybox config
>> (primarily I want to turn off telnet) to a custom version. What is
>> the correct way to handle this?
>>
>
> Well, naming indicates that you will need to add a
> busybox-<version>.config file.
And change the Makfile.in as well, IMHO that is the wrong path to follow.
>
> It is probably a good idea to scrap the <version> part as well, just
> have a generic busybox.config file. Kconfig options should not change
> that often, and user will be asked to answer yes/no to new features
> most times.
Is there any good reason at all to unconditionally ignore the busybox
config choosen by the user (many of the Atmel boards and a few other
does this)? Would a patch that just removes all these unconditional
configurations be accepted, or is there any deep reason for not allowing
Atmel users choose their own busybox configuration (and in the default
case choose the buildroot default instead of a board specific one)?
Regards
Anders Blomdell
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-10-13 6:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-12 10:16 [Buildroot] BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_CONFIG and Atmel targets Anders Blomdell
2008-10-13 6:12 ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2008-10-13 6:47 ` Anders Blomdell [this message]
2008-10-13 7:30 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2008-10-13 8:06 ` Anders Blomdell
2008-10-13 8:40 ` Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
2008-10-13 10:07 ` Peter Korsgaard
2008-10-13 10:28 ` Anders Blomdell
2008-10-15 16:04 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH] Obey BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX_CONFIG on atngw100 Anders Blomdell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48F2EF1B.70102@control.lth.se \
--to=anders.blomdell@control.lth.se \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox