From: Giulio Benetti <giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/3] NSPR cleanup
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2019 00:33:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48a16242-1c81-98ce-cf74-84f529fa94bd@benettiengineering.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191229095747.GW26395@scaer>
Hi Yann, All,
On 12/29/19 10:57 AM, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Giulio, All,
>
> On 2019-12-27 15:43 +0100, Giulio Benetti spake thusly:
>> This patchset makes libnspr available for every architecture, before
>> Xtensa and Arc architectures were not supported. By doing this we can then
>> remove additional check in Config.in files with
>> 'depends on BR2_PACKAGE_LIBNSPR_ARCH_SUPPORT' that becomes useless.
>>
>> Giulio Benetti (3):
>> package/libnspr: allow building for Arc Architecture
>
> I've applied that one...
>
>> package/libnspr: enable building with xtensa
>> package/libnspr: remove BR2_PACKAGE_LIBNSPR_ARCH_SUPPORT
>
> .. but those two ones are a feature patch. Let's at least wait for
> upstream to reply/apply it before we can carry it. As such, I've marked
> them as "Awaiting Upstream" (which is basically equivalanet to a reject,
> sorry).
Patch: "package/libnspr: enable building with xtensa" contains a patch
that is equal to previous patch I've already upstream to support
microblaze, nios-II and nds32. So Xtensa should do nothing different
from those 3 architectures and endianness is taken into account too.
So if upstream already trusted it:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1578363
they should trust the same this new one.
Thanks for reviewing and
Kind regards
--
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas
> Regards,
> Yann E. MORIN.
>
>>
>> package/ecryptfs-utils/Config.in | 2 --
>> ...6092_Add_support_for_building_xtensa.patch | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
>> package/libnspr/Config.in | 8 -----
>> package/libnss/Config.in | 2 --
>> package/spidermonkey/Config.in | 1 -
>> 5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 package/libnspr/0001-Bug_1606092_Add_support_for_building_xtensa.patch
>>
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> buildroot mailing list
>> buildroot at busybox.net
>> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-29 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-27 14:43 [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/3] NSPR cleanup Giulio Benetti
2019-12-27 14:43 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] package/libnspr: allow building for Arc Architecture Giulio Benetti
2019-12-27 14:43 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] package/libnspr: enable building with xtensa Giulio Benetti
2019-12-27 14:43 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] package/libnspr: remove BR2_PACKAGE_LIBNSPR_ARCH_SUPPORT Giulio Benetti
2019-12-29 9:57 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/3] NSPR cleanup Yann E. MORIN
2019-12-29 23:33 ` Giulio Benetti [this message]
2020-01-16 14:58 ` Giulio Benetti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48a16242-1c81-98ce-cf74-84f529fa94bd@benettiengineering.com \
--to=giulio.benetti@benettiengineering.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox