From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Maxim Grigoriev <maxim@tensilica.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2009 11:05:53 -0800
Subject: [Buildroot] {buildroot 0004384]: GCC 4.3.1 fails with cannot
 compute suffix of object files
In-Reply-To: <4983870C.6010607@hq.tensilica.com>
References: <4983870C.6010607@hq.tensilica.com>
Message-ID: <4985F291.5010002@hq.tensilica.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Is this the right mailing list to ask questions about BUILDROOT ?

Should I ask some official maintainers directly instead ?

If there is a communication policy described somewhere, please, refer me 
to it.

Thanks,
-- Maxim


Maxim Grigoriev wrote:
> There is a buildroot issue 0004384:
>
>     http://lists.uclibc.org/pipermail/buildroot/2008-September/010792.html
>
> I understand it's a generic architecture-independent GCC 4.3.1+ compiler 
> problem
> mentioned several times in different places ( e.g. bugzilla PRs 35577, 
> 35693 ).
>
> On the buildroot mailing, list I found a reference to the patch
>
>   gcc-4.3.1-compile.patch 
>
> introduced by "antezedens" somewhere around 09-10-08.
> But, I was not able to find this patch. Looks like it was withdrawn.
>
>                           * * * * *
>
> My question is: is this build failure supposed to be fixed on
> the BUILDROOT makefiles/scripts level ? Or, setting 
>
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$PWD/toolchain_build_arm/mpfr/lib:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH
>
> from the top of buildroot tree is assumed to be a standard
> setup for the buildroot build ? Is it documented anywhere ?
>
> Thanks,
> -- Maxim
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> buildroot mailing list
> buildroot at busybox.net
> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
>