From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxim Grigoriev Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 10:45:30 -0700 Subject: [Buildroot] ltp-testsuite package qustion In-Reply-To: References: <49C441BF.3070005@tensilica.com> Message-ID: <49C527BA.9020404@tensilica.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Thanks for your feedback. >> In ./package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk: >> >> - LTP_TESTSUITE_VERSION:=20070228 >> + LTP_TESTSUITE_VERSION:=20090228 That's what I did. Then, I found out that I have to redo the patches. Does it mean nobody tried recent LTP tests ? Thanks, -- Maxim H Hartley Sweeten wrote: > On Friday, March 20, 2009 6:24 PM, Maxim Grigoriev wrote: > >> Hello everybody, >> >> Can somebody, please, tell me how I can change a version of >> .../package/ltp-testsuite ? >> >> Is 20070228 a default ? >> It seems to be hard-coded. And, ltp-testsuite patches do not apply >> to a newer version. >> >> On the http://ltp.sourceforge.net/, the latest stable version is >> claimed to be >> >> ltp-full-20090228.tgz >> >> > > In ./package/ltp-testsuite/ltp-testsuite.mk: > > - LTP_TESTSUITE_VERSION:=20070228 > + LTP_TESTSUITE_VERSION:=20090228 > > >> A Two-years old version does not work quite well with recent >> versions of tools and kernel / kernel headers. >> >> One of the issues I observe is an undefined macro OPEN_MAX, which >> was removed from limits.h. It's now a variable, which can be obtained, >> say, by >> >> sysconf (_SC_OPEN_MAX). >> >> I'm hoping that switching to a newer version of LTP would fix this >> problem. >> >> Any help on this will be highly appreciated. >> > > Regards, > Hartley > >