Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ludger Keilig <buildroot@invalid-domain.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] buildroot-2010.05-rc2, problem with binutils-2.20.1
Date: Fri, 21 May 2010 11:09:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BF64DBB.9030805@invalid-domain.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1274422785.5719.8.camel@bernd-desktop>

Hello,

> I tried buildroot-2010.05-rc2:
> make at91rm9200df_defconfig
> make menuconfig
> make
> 
> buildroot terminates with:
> 
> checking for zlib.h... yes
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c: In function ?fibheap_union?:checking linker --as-needed support...
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c:151: warning: implicit declaration of function ?free?
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c: In function ?fibheap_replace_key_data?:
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c:220: error: ?LONG_MIN? undeclared (first use in this function)
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c:220: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c:220: error: for each function it appears in.)
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c: In function ?fibheap_delete_node?:
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c:261: error: ?LONG_MIN? undeclared (first use in this function)
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c:265: warning: implicit declaration of function ?abort?
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c:265: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ?abort?
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c: In function ?fibheap_consolidate?:
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c:368: warning: implicit declaration of function ?memset?
> /media/disk/br1005rc2/buildroot-2010.05-rc2/output/toolchain/binutils-2.20.1/libiberty/fibheap.c:368: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function ?memset?

Seems to be the same as in bug #1789.

For me, it helped to revert the patch introduced in commit
6b939d40f6a29a43277566adc9d4312d49cb3abf.
No, I don't like this, but at least it seems to work.


Ciao, Ludger

  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-21  9:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-21  6:19 [Buildroot] buildroot-2010.05-rc2, problem with binutils-2.20.1 Thomas
2010-05-21  9:09 ` Ludger Keilig [this message]
2010-05-21  9:53   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-05-21 10:25 ` Thomas Petazzoni
     [not found]   ` <1274479497.25288.3.camel@bernd-desktop>
2010-05-21 22:30     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-05-22  8:33       ` Thomas
2010-05-22 12:55         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2010-05-24 18:10           ` Thomas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BF64DBB.9030805@invalid-domain.net \
    --to=buildroot@invalid-domain.net \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox