From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:04:05 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit master 1/1] ed: bump to version 1.5 In-Reply-To: <87mxnwsvpz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <20101222232249.DB1F38E20B@busybox.osuosl.org> <20101223082919.0d574cf8@surf> <87vd2kswmm.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <20101223095612.60df592b@surf> <87mxnwsvpz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <4D133AB5.1010507@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 12/23/10 06:07, Peter Korsgaard wrote: > Thomas> Is that a configure script generated by autoconf ? > > No, so strictly seen this should use GENTARGET. > > Thomas> http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Configuration.html > > Thomas> It is recommended to pass the TARGET_CONFIGURE_OPTS as argument and not > Thomas> inside the environment: > > Ahh, interesting. It's a "let's make it look like autoconf" script :) I tried to fix the obvious problem to begin with which was the binary being built for the host architecture. Should we go for gentargets even if they behave like auto thus making the package file a tad bigger/redundant?