From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:17:41 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] libnl: bump to version 2.0 In-Reply-To: <4DB91691.4030308@visionsystems.de> References: <4DB7D29E.5000101@visionsystems.de> <87liywylxb.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <4DB8116B.901@visionsystems.de> <4DB81D23.8050505@zacarias.com.ar> <4DB91691.4030308@visionsystems.de> Message-ID: <4DB95AE5.7050805@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 04/28/11 04:26, Yegor Yefremov wrote: >>>> I see there's already a libnl-3.0, is there any reason why you stick >>>> with 2.0? >>> You're right. I first tried 3.0 and it failed by some package, so I took 2.0 and didn't verify what was wrong. But I just checked the 3.0 version and it works with all 5 packages: >>> >>> wpa_supplicant >>> iw >>> hostapd >>> kismet >>> ti-utils >> iw fails to build with 3.0 >> kismet builds without libnl support with 3.0 >> hostapd & wpa_supplicant build ok with your patches. >> Did you make clean completely before trying? Otherwise you'll get stale >> files in staging. >> Regards > > You're right, that were stale files in staging. I made a patch for iw and will send it also upstream. > > I'll look into kismet issue or has it gone with the latest version? > > Best regards, > Yegor Latest kismet doesn't handle libnl-3.0 yet and i've just received your patch for it. I'll give the whole set a run and Ack once i'm done, we probably want libnl-3.0 while we're at it like Peter said. It's supposed to be the first API/ABI-stable version. Regards.