From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2011 11:21:22 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] Add support for package-declared devices In-Reply-To: <201109061803.05970.arnout@mind.be> References: <20110905085210.705e63a0@skate> <4E64F592.8080209@free-electrons.com> <201109061803.05970.arnout@mind.be> Message-ID: <4E673792.5040001@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 06/09/2011 18:03, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > On Monday 05 September 2011 18:15:14, Maxime Ripard wrote: >> On 05/09/2011 08:52, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >>> Yes, exactly. However, I don't really like the name _DEVICE_TABLE >>> because, it might be for other purposes as well (setting setuid bit, >>> giving specific owner/group or permissions, etc.). Does anyone has an >>> idea for a better name? >> >> I agree, I don't like it neither, but I have no idea on what could be >> better... >> >> Files, maybe, but I find it way too generic. > > How about _FILE_MOD_TABLE (cfr. chmod)? Hmm, I'm not quite sure, it is more than just mod. Maybe reuse the "skeleton" term already in use in buildroot. > BTW, BR2_ROOTFS_DEVICE_TABLE the device_table.txt files should change in the > same way. Of course, and in the menuconfig too. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com