From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2011 12:04:05 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit] support: move patch-kernel.sh and
 rename it
In-Reply-To: <20110919224751.1d7ea3f3@skate>
References: <20110917063643.361CC8D728@busybox.osuosl.org>
 <4E77351C.6000302@atmel.com> <20110919224751.1d7ea3f3@skate>
Message-ID: <4E786515.6090603@atmel.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Hello Thomas,

On 9/19/2011 10:47 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Le Mon, 19 Sep 2011 14:27:08 +0200,
> Ludovic Desroches<ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>  a ?crit :
>
>> By the way, what do you think about a old patch ([RFC PATCH
>> v2]kernel-patch.sh: script changed to support archives in a proper
>> way) I have sent since I had troubles to apply several patches
>> (contained into a compressed archive) to the kernel because the order
>> to apply patch was not correct.
> Yes Ludovic, I still have your patch in mind. I even reviewed it no
> long ago. I promise to take care of it very soon.
>
> Thanks for your patience, and sorry for the huge delay,
No problem for the delay if the patch is still into the pipe. I was 
afraid it was a totally stupid patch since I had no answer :)

Ludovic