From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] User-enabled host packages?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 22:15:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4E7B9747.4080303@lucaceresoli.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110921153133.2d816865@skate>
Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> Le Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:00:49 +0200,
> Luca Ceresoli<luca@lucaceresoli.net> a ?crit :
>
>> All of these examples are about tools that could generally be
>> downloaded, built and installed by each developer on their own
>> machine. Nevertheless any developer may benefit from having them
>> built inside buildroot: it would be more handy and quick to build
>> them, and also guarantee that the version used in buildroot is
>> somehow tested by other buildroot users.
>>
>> Moreover, some packages (such as omap-u-boot-utils for which I posted
>> a patch) have their own right of being inside buildroot because they
>> also contribute to building the BR images. Having a user option to
>> build them, even if they are not required for image generation, would
>> require little effort.
>>
>> So the big question is: do we want some host packages to be enabled
>> vie a user option?
>>
>> Where do we want these user options?
>> How about a newly created "Host tools" menu at top level?
>>
>> Does anybody have additional examples in favor or against?
>
> And also:
>
> If we decide to show /some/ host tools (but not all) in menuconfig, what
> is the boundary between host tools visible in menuconfig and those not
> visible in menuconfig ?
My opinion is that this would be based on user needs.
Whenever a BR user feels the need of adding a host tool here, he would
propose a patch to do so. If nobody will feel the need for host-foo,
then nobody will write a patch to add it.
That's what happens with regular packages, ain't that true?
Luca
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-09-22 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-09-21 13:00 [Buildroot] User-enabled host packages? Luca Ceresoli
2011-09-21 13:31 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-09-22 20:15 ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2011-09-22 20:53 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2011-09-23 7:46 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-09-30 12:50 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-09-30 13:50 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2011-09-30 14:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-09-30 16:46 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-09-30 17:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2011-09-30 18:29 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2011-09-30 21:57 ` Luca Ceresoli
2011-10-01 20:11 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4E7B9747.4080303@lucaceresoli.net \
--to=luca@lucaceresoli.net \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox