From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Mack Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:20:24 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v3] Add package connman In-Reply-To: <87bormsjcz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> References: <4EDCFEB2.60603@gmail.com> <1323106241-22192-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> <87fwgyslv8.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <4EDD4EAE.7010808@gmail.com> <87bormsjcz.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <4EDD51B8.5050705@gmail.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 12/06/2011 12:13 AM, Peter Korsgaard wrote: >>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Mack writes: > > Hi, > > >> What about installing an initscript? I see there's an example init > >> script in the connman sources, but that doesn't seem directly applicable > >> to our busybox based system. > > Daniel> Yes, I can write one up. > > Great, thanks. > > Daniel> Yes, this is the reason why I added resolver support to uClibc some > Daniel> months back, and all the stuff in upstream now. > > >> I don't like to add it if doesn't work with uClibc based toolchains. > > Daniel> Well, it does, if you enable UCLIBC_HAS_RESOLVER_SUPPORT. What about > Daniel> adding a dependency for that? If people want to have connman, they have > Daniel> to manually select this feature and rebuild their uClibc. Does that > Daniel> sound ok? > > In concept, yes - But as the RESOLVER_SUPPORT isn't in any release yet, > it becomes a bit more tricky. We can backport the changes to 0.9.32, but > existing binary toolchains and ctng (unless Yann agrees and we also > backport to there) stuff will fail. In a previous discussion on this list I was asking about just this, and back then you agreed we could depend on BR2_UCLIBC_VERSION_SNAPSHOT in such a case until there's a new release. > I'll take a look at it. Ok, great. I'll post a new version with the discussed topics and leave the decision of how to handle the toolchain deps to you. Is that ok for you? Daniel