From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephan Raue Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 23:32:26 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] New package: kmod In-Reply-To: References: <1326726276-8442-1-git-send-email-yegorslists@googlemail.com> <201201161845.51186.arnout@mind.be> <8739bfcusn.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <201201171457.13088.arnout@mind.be> <87ty3upg82.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <4F15F6FA.5020805@openelec.tv> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 01/17/2012 11:13 PM, Yegor Yefremov wrote: > I added this package, because it is udev's dependency now. I'll have > to look into udev, to tell if it uses only library or binary too. As > we came to this topic, what is your opinion on adding /run? It also > became udev's dependency. I'll set my udev's patch series tomorrow. > Yegor _______________________________________________ buildroot > mailing list buildroot at busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot udev byself needs only the lib. the binarys can be used as insmod/rmmod/modprobe/modinfo replacement from module-init-tools or busybox's solution. the "kmod" binary byself is a multicall binary so insmod/rmmod/... can be symlinks to this binary. Stephan