From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ludovic Desroches Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2012 15:25:45 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Buildroot SKIPS PATCHES ??? In-Reply-To: References: <4F9341C9.8000508@petroprogram.com> Message-ID: <4F955859.6020401@atmel.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hi Stefan, Le 04/23/2012 02:33 PM, Thomas De Schampheleire a ?crit : > Hi Stefan, > > On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:24 AM, Stefan Fr?berg > wrote: >> Good day >> >> >> I have tried adding two new packages to my local copy of buildroot, >> first one is xplc-package (version 0.3.13) and the second one is >> wvstreams (version 4.2.2) which needs xplc. >> >> The first one, xplc, builds nicely. >> >> >> But for some reason, for wvstreams package the Buildroot does not apply >> the patches at all. >> Buildroot just skips all the nine wvstreams patch-files and continues >> configuring ... >> :-( >> >> I have included all files (Config.in, .mk-files and patches) for both >> packages here. >> I would be very gratefull if somebody could help to solve this mystery. >> >> Please contact me at: >> stefan.froberg at petroprogram.com >> > > Have you solved this problem already? > > I have copied your wvstreams .mk file and one of the patches, and did > not have problems applying the patches. > Which version of buildroot are you using? > Have you tried deleting the entire output/build/wvstreams* directory > (thus removing the stamp files) ? > What is the output of the wvstreams build? It should print a message > about each phase (download, extract, patch, configure, ...). > > Do you have other patches or directories inside package/wvstreams ? > The current rules for patching are somewhat complicated and can depend > on such other files. The rules are in package/Makefile.package.in. > > Best regards, > Thomas Have a look here: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/152912/ Maybe you have not this patch. Regards Ludovic