From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] Convert gettext to autotargets
Date: Mon, 21 May 2012 10:12:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FB9F8F0.5000201@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFbHwiQX5facsOBf3TYDU4m_-u=AP1kJzEabJhWgy5-9c=GVqw@mail.gmail.com>
Le 21/05/2012 10:08, Will Newton a ?crit :
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@uclibc.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> "Samuel" == Samuel Martin <s.martin49@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> >> This seems backwards. Wouldn't you want to keep the binaries if libintl
>> >> is enabled?
>>
>> Samuel> Actually, do we really need to remove these binaries?
>> Samuel> On an arm build, these 3 binaries take less than 80KB.
>>
>> I don't feel strongly about it. The stuff needing gettext is typically
>> quite a lot bigger than 80KB, so perhaps simplifying stuff is indeed the
>> way to go.
>
> I would suggest that if we used to remove it then we should keep
> removing it. Otherwise you end up in the situation where you update
> buildroot and your filesystem image gets ever so slightly bigger and
> won't fit in flash any more.
I think that it is something you should expect when upgrading buildroot.
I mean, you already have a lot of packages version bump that can lead to
the same filesystem size increase, with the result you described.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-21 8:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-04 14:46 [Buildroot] [pull request] Pull request for branch for-2012.05/packages-updates Maxime Ripard
2012-04-04 14:46 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] Convert gettext to autotargets Maxime Ripard
2012-04-04 14:56 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-05-08 11:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] " Samuel Martin
2012-05-08 11:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] gettext: Rename BR2_PACKAGE_LIBINTL to BR2_PACKAGE_GETTEXT_NEEDS_BINARIES Samuel Martin
2012-05-11 21:37 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-05-11 22:45 ` Samuel Martin
2012-05-12 14:43 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-05-08 11:19 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] Cleanup gettext/libintl dependencies Samuel Martin
2012-05-19 21:46 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] Convert gettext to autotargets Peter Korsgaard
2012-05-21 7:52 ` Samuel Martin
2012-05-21 8:02 ` Peter Korsgaard
2012-05-21 8:08 ` Will Newton
2012-05-21 8:12 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2012-05-21 8:12 ` Peter Korsgaard
2012-05-21 8:06 ` Maxime Ripard
2012-04-15 19:09 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] " Samuel Martin
2012-04-04 14:46 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] Bump systemd to version 44 Maxime Ripard
2012-04-05 11:16 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FB9F8F0.5000201@free-electrons.com \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox