From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2012 14:58:06 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Has anybody got systemd to work? In-Reply-To: <4FDF24E2.6020603@free-electrons.com> References: <20120618091508.a0fd469d78e12fcca7fdf4c0@kinali.ch> <4FDF24E2.6020603@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <4FDF25DE.20507@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Le 18/06/2012 14:53, Maxime Ripard a ?crit : > Hi Dmitry, > > I was just replying to your previous mail. > > Le 18/06/2012 14:46, Dmitry Golubovsky a ?crit : >> Maxime: do you use an alternative toolchain with systemd? > > After a bit of testing, it seems indeed that the bug is uclibc-only, and > didn't encountered it as I do most of my testing using glibc. > > Anyway, if it is only the %ms thing that is breaking systemd on uclibc, > it shouldn't be such a big problem. Quickly grepping the systemd source > code returns 17 occurences of such case, so a patch is definitely doable. > > I won't have much time, do you mind doing so and sending us the patch so > that it could get included ? Also, it seems that the %m modifier support has been merged 3 weeks ago in uclibc: http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/libc/stdio/_scanf.c?id=8cfb43de636faa401634340d1a18404844f9ba5a Looks like we will definitely need a patch :) -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com