From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: "Yann E. MORIN" <yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
Cc: Romain Naour <romain.naour@gmail.com>,
Gwenhael Goavec-Merou <gwenhael.goavec-merou@trabucayre.com>,
buildroot@buildroot.org
Subject: Re: [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 3/3] package/armadillo: allows to select between clapack, lapack or openblas
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2021 13:13:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4e793690-349c-af33-e16c-b54489fdd1ff@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f3776222-ad4d-2d73-9bf7-a79b335d10f3@mind.be>
On 25/07/2021 11:36, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> I'll send a v5 which fixes it. I still want Gwenhael to confirm that it's good
> in this shape though.
There won't be a v5 coming because I can't overcome the circular dependency.
I think, actually, that we should just drop the clapack package. It's dead (the
lapack maintainers no longer generate clapack based on new lapack releases,
probably because f2c is unmaintained).
I remember Romain and I were banging our heads against lapack, clapack and
openblas a couple of years ago on a Buildroot developer meeting - I believe it
was in the context of numpy at the time. I don't remember exactly what the
conclusion was, but IIRC there was no good solution at the time either.
Well, in the end I went ahead and sent a v5 which removes clapack and
re-introduces the choice for BLAS provider. The "choice" for LAPACK provider is
automatic though (it's just yes or no anyway).
Gwenhael, what do you think?
Regards,
Arnout
_______________________________________________
buildroot mailing list
buildroot@busybox.net
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-25 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-24 21:45 [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/3] package/clapack: introduce BR2_PACKAGE_CLAPACK_ARCH_SUPPORTS Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)
2021-07-24 21:45 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 2/3] package/lapack: introduce BR2_PACKAGE_LAPACK_ARCH_SUPPORTS Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)
2021-07-25 7:47 ` Yann E. MORIN
2021-07-24 21:45 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 3/3] package/armadillo: allows to select between clapack, lapack or openblas Arnout Vandecappelle (Essensium/Mind)
2021-07-25 7:57 ` Yann E. MORIN
2021-07-25 9:36 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2021-07-25 11:13 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2021-07-25 7:47 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH v4 1/3] package/clapack: introduce BR2_PACKAGE_CLAPACK_ARCH_SUPPORTS Yann E. MORIN
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4e793690-349c-af33-e16c-b54489fdd1ff@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@buildroot.org \
--cc=gwenhael.goavec-merou@trabucayre.com \
--cc=romain.naour@gmail.com \
--cc=yann.morin.1998@free.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox