From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 10:15:52 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] less: build after busybox In-Reply-To: References: <1343330317-24730-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <50124E38.6040504@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 07/27/12 00:30, Samuel Martin wrote: >> > +# Build after busybox, full-blown is better >> > +LESS_DEPENDENCIES = ncurses $(if $(BR2_PACKAGE_BUSYBOX),busybox) > Though I understand why you prefer this one, I somehow don't really > like it... because it's not about build dependency, but build/install > order... I also don't really like it. For instance, if you rebuild busybox, this will not trigger a reinstall of less so it will again be the busybox version that prevails... However, I don't see a better solution than this one. For sure, selecting less and getting busybox is worse than this. One alternative could be to automatically deselect less from busybox when the full-blown less is selected. But also that is a bit complex I think. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F