From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:42:34 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 6/8] fontconfig: add license info
In-Reply-To: <503A97DA.8000305@mind.be>
References: <1345407510-10058-1-git-send-email-danomimanchego123@gmail.com>
 <1345407510-10058-6-git-send-email-danomimanchego123@gmail.com>
 <20120821125637.6b0257bc@skate>
 <CANxTyt7w48eF1TBWJzbtaz_uao988-=y6W6LhTJF+CP9FUJNCg@mail.gmail.com>
 <503A97DA.8000305@mind.be>
Message-ID: <503B410A.10201@lucaceresoli.net>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
> On 08/22/12 02:39, Danomi Manchego wrote:
>> What about sqlite?  According to 
>> http://www.sqlite.org/copyright.html, it is "public domain". Should 
>> sqlite's license
>> also be "sqlite license", or "public domain"?
>
>  I'd use 'Public domain', it's a very specific and well-known legal 
> term.  It
> means the authors forfeit their copyright, and there are no 
> restrictions whatsoever
> on the use of the software.

I agree with Arnout. "public domain" is much more informative, and is not
ambiguous.

Luca