From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 08:37:31 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] jimsh: new package In-Reply-To: <50483D77.40902@mind.be> References: <1346778052-31923-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <50483D77.40902@mind.be> Message-ID: <50488AFB.9020205@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 09/06/12 03:06, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote: > I guess a patch that installs usb_modeswitch's tcl script will follow > then? > > You'll probably want to add a hidden BR2_NEEDS_TCLSH which selects > JIMSH if TCL is not defined. And/or a HAS_TCLSH that is selected by > jimsh and tcl. Or should those symbols only be introduced when a > package actually selects or depends on them? I'm on the HAS_TCLSH side since there aren't many tclsh-using packages at the moment, and there may be some (sick) valid reason for both with jimsh not being as complete as full Tcl. But that's for another patch when (if) jimsh gets in, it's not the first iteration, there was one last year that went by silently :) Regards.