From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:51:37 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] grantlee: new package In-Reply-To: <5090E5F4.6040903@gmail.com> References: <508EFA6D.7000404@gmail.com> <50906999.9000002@mind.be> <5090E5F4.6040903@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5090E699.5070903@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 10/31/12 09:48, Zoltan Gyarmati wrote: > Hi, > > Thx for the detailed comments, i'll resend it. And as i realized in the debian/ubuntu repos the package called libgrantlee, > so maybe it would be better to call it so also in buildroot, as it's more logical name for a library :) What do you think? In buildroot, we prefer to use the upstream name. In Debian/Fedora distros, they split packages into a lib- and a bin- package (and additional -dev and -dbg packages). For grantlee, there is no bin-, so you don't get a plain grantlee package. In buildroot, we don't split the packages (sometimes there are sub-options to disable the binaries). Therefore, there is no reason to change the name. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286540 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F