From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:58:45 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] RPC.h and busybox In-Reply-To: <20121031145249.GJ30343@sapphire.tkos.co.il> References: <20121031114118.GF30343@sapphire.tkos.co.il> <20121031153101.41b26063@skate> <20121031145249.GJ30343@sapphire.tkos.co.il> Message-ID: <50913CA5.4050307@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 10/31/12 11:52, Baruch Siach wrote: > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 03:31:01PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >> On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:41:18 +0200, Baruch Siach wrote: >>>> Does anybody have any solution? >>> >>> This is a toolchain level problem. Either downgrade to a toolchain with 2.13 >>> glibc, or use a toolchain with tirpc. >> >> I have posted a patch set some time ago that fixes this. It tells >> Buildroot whether the toolchain has RPC support or not (even for >> glibc/eglibc toolchains), and then is capable of building libtirpc when >> the toolchain does not provide RPC support. >> >> I intend to adjust a few things and update it, before resending it. >> Maybe before the Buildroot meeting this week-end, maybe after. > > Well, this only solves the problem for internal toolchains, isn't it? > > baruch Internal toolchains are just uClibc, and only glibc/eglibc are affected, so no, quite the opposite. Regards.