From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:23:07 -0800
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 0/2] add support for xtensa back to buildroot
In-Reply-To: <20121110115729.357ebfdd@skate>
References: <509b2928.67dc440a.70c6.6325@mx.google.com>
 <20121108082247.55eac2b2@skate> <509C8B4F.6000308@zankel.net>
 <20121109091435.0603a98c@skate> <20121110115729.357ebfdd@skate>
Message-ID: <50A15AAB.5020202@zankel.net>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On 11/10/2012 02:57 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> I've also seen that Qemu has an Xtensa support. It would be nice if you
>> could create a qemu_xtensa_<somemachine>_defconfig with the necessary
>> kernel configuration and al (see other qemu_<foo>_defconfig that we
>> have in configs/) so that other people could build a Xtensa userspace
>> and run it inside qemu. At the moment, the qemu-system-xtensa supports
>> the following machines:
>>
>> $ qemu-system-xtensa -M ?
>> Supported machines are:
>> none                 empty machine
>> lx60                 lx60 EVB (dc232b)
>> lx200                lx200 EVB (dc232b)
>> sim                  sim machine (dc232b) (default)
> Do you have any plans for proposing the support of a Qemu board using
> the Xtensa architecture? Qemu already supports 2-3 platforms, so it
> would be nice if Buildroot had a defconfig to generate a working system
> for one of them.
Yes, I'm planing to add support for QEMU, but it will probably take a
bit to understand it better before I have a config and maybe some patches.

Thanks,
-Chris