From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFC] How to handle targets that need more than one file system to boot?
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:53:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50E54714.8060602@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201301030940.07495.yann.morin.1998@free.fr>
On 01/03/13 09:40, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> Steve, All,
>
> On Thursday 03 January 2013 01:32:52 Steve Calfee wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Yann E. MORIN<yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
>>> > > Arnout, Steve, All,
>>> > >
>>> > > On Wednesday 02 January 2013 Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
>>>> > >> On 12/25/12 04:52, Steve Calfee wrote:
>>>>> > >> > On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Yann E. MORIN<yann.morin.1998@free.fr> wrote:
>>> > > [--SNIP--]
>>>>>> > >> >> For now, buildroot can build a single filesystem image. This is not useable
>>>>>> > >> >> for these systems. The only possibility as of today is to configure BR to
>>>>>> > >> >> generate a tarball, and have a custom script that does the required split up
>>>>>> > >> >> of the different components.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> That's not really true, is it? Buildroot generates the ext2fs and the
>>>> > >> boot loader and kernel images, you only have to create the partitions and
>>>> > >> the fatfs and pull everything together into a single image.
>>> > >
>>> > > So, you said the same as me: Buildroot (without external tools) can
>>> > > not generate more than one*filesystem* image (ext2, tar, whatever).
>>> > >
>> >
>> > Hi Yann,
>> >
>> > Maybe we are talking about different things. I think there is a config
>> > option in buildroot that allows you to build multiple output
>> > filesystems, I believe I have created ext4 and a tar.gz as outputs. I
>> > think there are also various flash file systems you can create.
> Indeed, we're not speaking the same. Yes, Buildroot can generate different
> filesystem images with the*same* content.
>
> I am trying to address the case where different parts of the filesystem
> hierarchy have to be stored in different filesystems, because they have
> to be in different partitions.
>
> For example, on the Raspberry Pi, we have to have:
> - the first partition must be vfat and must contain the few binary
> blobs (bootloader and config for the GPU, the Linux kernel and its
> command line)
> - the rest of the filesystem hierarchy can be whatever (eg. an extN
> filesystem for / on the second partition, and another one for /home
> on yet a third partition)
>
> Buildroot can not handle this case, which is the one I want to address
> if it makes sense.
I think the usual case is that you have one rootfs image (e.g. ext2)
and a number of other component images (e.g. bootloader, boot script,
config for the GPU). Buildroot puts each of these in the images
directory. In _some_ cases (e.g. RPi), the non-rootfs components should
be put together into a fat filesystem. It is true that buildroot doesn't
have support for that, but it is relatively simple to do that in a
post-build script:
mkfs.vfat /dev/sdb1
sudo mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt
cp output/images/* /mnt
sudo umount /mnt
There is certainly no need to split up the rootfs itself. (Unless the
RPi-specific things install stuff in the rootfs while it really should go
into the images directory, but that's a different issue).
AFAIK there is no equivalent of genext2fs for FAT, so it would be
rather difficult to make a boot-vfat.img in buildroot (use sudo? fuse?
pmount?).
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-03 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-24 0:00 [Buildroot] [RFC] How to handle targets that need more than one file system to boot? Yann E. MORIN
2012-12-25 3:52 ` Steve Calfee
2013-01-02 6:57 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-01-02 23:56 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-01-03 0:32 ` Steve Calfee
2013-01-03 8:31 ` Willy Lambert
2013-01-03 17:33 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-01-03 17:54 ` Bjørn Forsman
2013-01-03 18:08 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-01-03 8:40 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-01-03 8:52 ` Jeremy Rosen
2013-01-03 8:53 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-01-03 8:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-03 9:13 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-01-03 10:30 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50E54714.8060602@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox