From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIEZyw7ZiZXJn?= <stefan.froberg@petroprogram.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:31:15 +0200
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] new package: proxychains
In-Reply-To: <20130108201808.7ee86751@skate>
References: <1356222029-6290-1-git-send-email-stefan.froberg@petroprogram.com>
 <20130108180957.30c9f629@skate> <50EC6C03.2040504@petroprogram.com>
 <20130108201808.7ee86751@skate>
Message-ID: <50EC7403.9010309@petroprogram.com>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

Hi Thomas

8.1.2013 21:18, Thomas Petazzoni kirjoitti:
> Dear Stefan Fr?berg,
>
> On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 20:57:07 +0200, Stefan Fr?berg wrote:
>
>> Hmmm... could this be a some weird parallel compiling problem ????
> No. proxychains is a program that LD_PRELOAD a library to overload some
> of the C library functions. So it reimplements some functions of the C
> library, but in this case, it reimplements getnameinfo() with a
> prototype that doesn't match the one of the C library.

That's really strange because it did match my headers and I had no problem.

> Maybe an idea would be to upgrade to proxychains 4.4:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/proxychains/forums/forum/644747/topic/6519406.
>
> The main page of proxychains mentions 3.1 as the latest version, but it
> is not the case. The official Git repo at
> https://github.com/rofl0r/proxychains contains many more recent
> versions. Most likely the problem is already fixed in a more recent
> version than 3.1.
>
> Could you test a more recent version and submit the corresponding patch?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Thomas
Ok, Ill take a look and try a newer version.

Stefan