From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Stefan_Fr=F6berg?= Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 18:51:39 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] RTLD_DEEPBIND and uClibc In-Reply-To: References: <50F6A26D.4030607@petroprogram.com> <20130117000037.39ccc628@skate> <50F74776.60503@petroprogram.com> <20130117093159.2d46ecfd@skate> <50F8019C.4000003@petroprogram.com> Message-ID: <50F82C1B.2040709@petroprogram.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello Alex! 17.1.2013 18:18, Alex Bradbury kirjoitti: > On 17 January 2013 13:50, Stefan Fr?berg > wrote: >> And if even *that* is not enought then I could consider maybe switching >> to musl ... maybe ... > I've been following musl for a while - it really might be worth giving > a go. They're aiming to be more lightweight than Glibc, while more > functional than uclibc. Plus some musl patches for buildroot and > crosstool-ng would be kind of awesome ;) > > Alex Is it true that musl supports (at least most) of the glibc ABI ? (my biggest worry so far when using uClibc is that I encounter an application that is provided as glibc-only binary and no source code provided.) What about it's configuration ? Does it have nice kconf style "make menuconfig" like uClibc or what ? Stefan