From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC] Fix avr32 build using internal toolchain
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 09:54:04 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FBE8EC.6060602@zacarias.com.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHt8ZCOH9FgqzkB2KHJSSBc3k76-07iYNfsQ_rjzQCzOFGLEAg@mail.gmail.com>
On 01/20/2013 08:01 AM, Simon Dawson wrote:
> Yes, I understand that the avr32 toolchain is in a bit of a mess. I'm
> using host gcc version 4.6 without problems; from memory, I think it's
> 4.7 that doesn't work --- I might have misremembered 'though...
With gentoo's 4.6.3 it fails for me in the same way as described at
Atmel's site http://www.atmel.no/buildroot/buildroot-issues.html
(Error: invalid register list)
> Yes, I think we discussed this briefly at the Buildroot Developer Days
> in Barcelona. My understanding is that avr32 is regarded
> semi-officially as an end-of-life architecture. Atmel technical
> support are, for the time being, still dealing with support queries
> for avr32.
Do you know if the UC3 microcontrollers are in the same boat?
If they aren't there may still be some hope for the toolchain (at least
binutils/gcc, not much for uclibc/linux).
> From my own perspective, I'd rather keep the avr32 support in
> Buildroot for now. I don't know how many other people are using the
> architecture --- not that many, I suspect. Would that be a major
> problem?
Testing and fixing is an issue on the toolchain side when there's no
upgrade path possible.
I wouldn't like to stick to old and potentially vulnerable versions of
packages (example: gnutls) because the toolchain is too old to handle
it, it's problematic.
And dragging arch-specific patches isn't fun either.
Maybe we can keep it and start marking broken packages as !BR2_avr32 ?
That may be a rough ride though with all the dependencies.
Regards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-20 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-17 22:16 [Buildroot] [PATCH RFC] Fix avr32 build using internal toolchain spdawson at gmail.com
2013-01-19 10:38 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 11:01 ` Simon Dawson
2013-01-20 12:54 ` Gustavo Zacarias [this message]
2013-01-20 13:22 ` Simon Dawson
2013-01-20 14:22 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-01-20 21:24 ` Simon Dawson
2013-01-20 14:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-01-20 21:23 ` Simon Dawson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FBE8EC.6060602@zacarias.com.ar \
--to=gustavo@zacarias.com.ar \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox