Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [git commit] qextserialport: don't require Qt GUI module
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 08:00:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <511350F7.9060504@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50A580BA.5020402@mind.be>

On 16/11/12 00:54, Arnout Vandecappelle wrote:
[snip]
>> +diff -Nrup qextserialport-f83b4e7ca922e53.orig/qextserialport.pro
>> qextserialport-f83b4e7ca922e53/qextserialport.pro
>> +--- qextserialport-f83b4e7ca922e53.orig/qextserialport.pro 2012-10-17 09:13:53.000000000 +0200
>> ++++ qextserialport-f83b4e7ca922e53/qextserialport.pro    2012-11-13 22:48:29.249431510 +0100
>> +@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@ macx:qesp_mac_framework {
>> +
>> + win32|mac:!wince*:!win32-msvc:!macx-xcode:CONFIG += debug_and_release
>> build_all
>> +
>> ++!win32*:!wince*:QT -= gui
>> ++
>> + #generate proper library name
>> + greaterThan(QT_MAJOR_VERSION, 4) {
>> +     QESP_LIB_BASENAME = QtExtSerialPort
>
>   After submitting this patch upstream, the feedback I got is that it should
> not be necessary to do this.  Looking a bit deeper, it turns out they are
> right, in a way.  We use the qws mkspecs file, which includes
> QT += core gui network
>
>   I.e., by default the gui will always be linked in, and -DQT_GUI_LIB  will be added
> to the compile flags. It seems logical that Qt would remove the ones that aren't
> installed, but it doesn't.  So we should do it ourselves.
>
>   While we're at it, we could also throw out our patching of the platform-specific
> qws config file: we are anyway replacing all "interesting" variables with our own
> values, so all useful content is thrown away.  Instead, we could make our own spec
> file that contains exactly what we need:
>
> include(../../common/linux.conf)
> include(../../common/gcc-base-unix.conf)
> include(../../common/g++-unix.conf)
> include(../../common/qws.conf)
> <our stuff goes here>
> load(qt_config)
>
>
>   What do you think?


  Thomas,

  Now that you're working on Qt5, maybe you can check with qt-project if 
this is indeed the way to go?

  Regards,
  Arnout

-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-07  7:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-14 21:44 [Buildroot] [git commit] qextserialport: don't require Qt GUI module Peter Korsgaard
2012-11-15 23:54 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2012-11-16  6:26   ` Peter Korsgaard
2012-11-16  7:44     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-02-07  7:00   ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-02-07  8:24     ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=511350F7.9060504@mind.be \
    --to=arnout@mind.be \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox