From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 09:44:03 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] Revert "uClibc: port linuxthreads errnopatch to 0.9.33.2" In-Reply-To: References: <1361455787-4846-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> <877gm1hhsm.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk> Message-ID: <51276813.7050604@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 02/22/2013 09:39 AM, Sagaert Johan wrote: > Hi > > I saw this patch was reverted, so I wonder is there (already or in the making) a way so I can point to a directory in the buildroot > configuration where I have additional ?Clibc patches and a 'series' file ? (similar like the infrastructure for the kernel patches.) > Annoying problem anyway, my app fails at runtime without the patch. > > Johan Hi. Out of curiosity why don't you want to use NPTL with the latest uClibc? If i remember correctly using anything other than NPTL is not recommended. You could use a trick similar to toolchain/gcc/*/powerpc-link-with-math-lib.patch.conditional for this patch but in a reverse fashion (the gcc patch is applied for powerpc only, you could apply for everything except sparc, though you'd had to check if it's the only affected arch - it's a build issue so it shouldn't be difficult). The patch conditions are set in toolchain/gcc/gcc-uclibc-4.x.mk Since the patch fixes issues i don't think Peter would disagree in applying it. Regards.