From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 10:30:46 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] editing device_table_dev.txt In-Reply-To: <5126AEA6.7060004@petroprogram.com> References: <1361403460.22521.44.camel@genx.eng.msli.com> <5125F38B.2030204@petroprogram.com> <5125F50C.7020902@petroprogram.com> <20130221102315.GB12155@sapphire.tkos.co.il> <5125F7BB.50403@petroprogram.com> <5126A675.2060308@mind.be> <5126A8C7.2000009@petroprogram.com> <5126AC9B.30302@mind.be> <5126AEA6.7060004@petroprogram.com> Message-ID: <51288C46.2030001@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 22/02/13 00:32, Stefan Fr?berg wrote: > Speaking of udev, I must say that Im not very happy of that recent > including of systemd as hard dependency. > If it would be optional then it would be ok and fine, but to forcefully > cram yet-another init system (in addition to bazillion other existing ones) > down the throats of latest udev users .... not good, not good at all! If I understand correctly, you can still build udev without systemd, they're just packaged together. They have added a somewhat hard-to-avoid dependency on dbus, though. But then, why would you want udev to begin with? mdev can do everything that udev can, no? Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F