From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 15:39:27 -0300
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] swig: new package
In-Reply-To: <20130409203511.459ba1c4@skate>
References: <1365532027-13639-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
 <1365532027-13639-2-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
 <20130409203511.459ba1c4@skate>
Message-ID: <5164605F.1000800@zacarias.com.ar>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On 04/09/2013 03:35 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

> Does it make sense to support swig on the target if we are deprecating
> the native toolchain on target and related development files?

Maybe not.
I can respin and also go on a deprecation spree for other packages that
fit in the same scenario.
Regards.