From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 20:18:26 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] busybox: move patches to new model In-Reply-To: <1366642067-26447-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> References: <1366642067-26447-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <51757EF2.3060000@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 22/04/13 16:47, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > On commit 5538e4766201aa0c1c23721cfc99cbbde595964b the versioned package > patches changed the directory structure but the packages weren't fixed. > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo Zacarias > --- > package/busybox/{busybox-1.19.4 => 1.19.4}/busybox-1.19.4-udhcp.patch | 0 > .../busybox/{busybox-1.20.2 => 1.20.2}/busybox-1.20.2-kernel_ver.patch | 0 > package/busybox/{busybox-1.20.2 => 1.20.2}/busybox-1.20.2-ntpd.patch | 0 > .../{busybox-1.20.2 => 1.20.2}/busybox-1.20.2-pkg-config-selinux.patch | 0 > .../busybox/{busybox-1.20.2 => 1.20.2}/busybox-1.20.2-sys-resource.patch | 0 > package/busybox/{busybox-1.21.0 => 1.21.0}/busybox-1.21.0-mdev.patch | 0 > package/busybox/{busybox-1.21.0 => 1.21.0}/busybox-1.21.0-platform.patch | 0 > package/busybox/{busybox-1.21.0 => 1.21.0}/busybox-1.21.0-xz.patch | 0 I believe the idea was to have plain NNNN-xxxx.patch files (without package or version number) in the patch directories - like is the case already for gcc and gdb. But check the developer day report to be sure. And while you're at it, numbering the patches would be nice. Regards, Arnout -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F