From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 09:02:01 -0300
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] poco: not available for all architectures
In-Reply-To: <20130516115453.GF4709@tarshish>
References: <1368704401-1832-1-git-send-email-gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
 <20130516115453.GF4709@tarshish>
Message-ID: <5194CAB9.8020102@zacarias.com.ar>
List-Id: <buildroot.busybox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: buildroot@busybox.net

On 05/16/2013 08:54 AM, Baruch Siach wrote:
>>  comment "poco requires a toolchain with WCHAR, threads, and C++ support"
>>  	depends on !BR2_USE_WCHAR || !BR2_INSTALL_LIBSTDCPP \
>>  		|| !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_HAS_THREADS
>> +	depends on !(BR2_aarch64 || BR2_arc || BR2_bfin || BR2_microblaze || BR2_mipsel || BR2_xtensa)
> 
> Enabling this comment when it is the architecture that is not supported might 
> confuse the user. Maybe we should add another comment? How is this handled in 
> other packages?

I'm actually disabling the comment if it's not a supported architecture
with that line (same as the option itself).
Regards.