From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] binutils doesn't like -elf2flt option
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:22:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BEAB3A.8010408@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <kphffs$v5g$1@ger.gmane.org>
On 06/15/13 12:26, Adam Nielsen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to compile a toolchain with elf2flt enabled, but I'm having
> problems getting binutils to compile.
>
> Normally the parameter "-W,-elf2flt" is passed to GCC to tell it to pass
> "-elf2flt" to the linker. elf2flt then picks this up and does what it
> needs to, courtesy of a wrapper script around "ld". I have set this
> parameter in TARGET_CFLAGS in one of the buildroot makefiles.
>
> However when I am compiling binutils, it seems that elf2flt has not been
> installed yet, so it is not recognising the -elf2flt option, and gives me
> this error:
>
> arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi-gcc -o conftest -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
> -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -pipe -Os -Wl,-elf2flt
> -DBR_BINFMT_FLAT --static -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/foo conftest.c >&5
> arm-buildroot-linux-uclibcgnueabi/bin/ld: warning: cannot find entry
> symbol lf2flt; defaulting to 00000000000080c0
>
> I think binutils needs to use elf2flt, otherwise any binaries it produces
> will not be in BFLT format, so I am guessing I need to tell buildroot to
> compile elf2flt before binutils. Does this sound correct? Is it even
> possible to compile something like that before binutils? Or do I have to
> somehow avoid passing the -elf2flt parameter to binutils? How might one
> achieve this?
elf2flt already depends on binutils (it uses libbfd), so this won't
work. And as Thomas mentioned, this is only relevant for target-binutils
(which you probably don't even need).
However, it looks like there is no explicit dependency on elf2flt when
building the toolchain. Probably elf2flt should be added to BASE_TARGETS,
to make sure it gets built before all the rest.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-17 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-15 10:26 [Buildroot] binutils doesn't like -elf2flt option Adam Nielsen
2013-06-16 16:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-17 6:22 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-06-17 7:10 ` Adam Nielsen
2013-06-18 16:00 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-06-18 20:34 ` Adam Nielsen
2013-06-19 6:25 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-19 8:03 ` Adam Nielsen
2013-06-19 8:21 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-19 9:56 ` Adam Nielsen
2013-06-19 10:06 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-19 10:11 ` Adam Nielsen
2013-06-19 10:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-20 9:16 ` Adam Nielsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51BEAB3A.8010408@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox