From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] Changes in the Buildroot autobuilders
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 08:21:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BFFC5D.4040600@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130617175407.GA3202@free.fr>
On 17/06/13 19:54, Yann E. MORIN wrote:
> On 2013-06-17 11:20 -0500, Spenser Gilliland spake thusly:
>> >Are we sure we want to add more variables to the .mk files. One of
>> >Buildroot's main differentiators is the cleanliness of these files in
>> >comparison to other packaging methods.
+1
At least on the short term, the number of maintainers will be small and
the number of packages per maintainer will be large. Some maintainers
will also be fairly ephemeral - e.g. Maxime added support for systemd a
year ago, but probably by now he doesn't consider himself a maintainer of
it anymore. Also the rules may be a little more complex than based on
package name.
So I think a nice solution would be to add a script in support/scripts
that explicitly encodes all the maintainers - maintainers can add
themselves with patches (just like in the kernel). The a.b.o would fetch
the script once a day just before sending out its daily mails, and call
it with everything it knows about the build failure set in the environment.
>> >
>> >As an alternative, this information could be pulled from the git log
>> >and anyone who has made a change to the package directory in the past
>> >would be subscribed to errors.
> No, I am not in favour of this solution.
>
> Being a 'maintainer' should be voluntary, opt-in, and explicit.
+1 too.
However, Spenser points out in another mail:
> I think many people would like to know if something they did may have
> triggered a bug, not just the maintainer of the package.
I could agree with sending mails automatically to the authors of a
package commit if the commit was done in the last week or so.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-18 6:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-16 16:00 [Buildroot] Changes in the Buildroot autobuilders Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-16 17:03 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-06-16 17:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-16 17:25 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-06-16 18:05 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-17 7:45 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-06-17 7:49 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-17 16:20 ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-06-17 17:54 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-06-17 18:07 ` ANDY KENNEDY
2013-06-17 20:09 ` Mischa Jonker
2013-06-18 7:12 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-17 20:39 ` Spenser Gilliland
2013-06-18 6:21 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-06-18 7:16 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 16:46 ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-06-17 6:25 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51BFFC5D.4040600@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox