From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 01:10:30 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] targets: move target options to their own sub-menu In-Reply-To: <1376598482-9492-1-git-send-email-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> References: <1376598482-9492-1-git-send-email-yann.morin.1998@free.fr> Message-ID: <520D5FE6.2090007@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 15/08/13 22:28, Yann E. MORIN wrote: > From: "Yann E. MORIN" > > Currently, all target options lie in the top-level menu. > This looks a bit clumsy, since all other options are neatly > folded into their own sematic sub-menus each. > > Move the target option into their own sub-menu too. > > Signed-off-by: "Yann E. MORIN" > --- > arch/Config.in | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/Config.in b/arch/Config.in > index 0b5b218..640926a 100644 > --- a/arch/Config.in > +++ b/arch/Config.in > @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ > +menu "Target options" I completely agree with the idea - especially in the xconfig, the big list of architecture options is extremely annoying. However, the menu title is not very clear. How about "Target architecture selection"? Or maybe Target CPU architecture Target CPU architecture family Target CPU architecture variant Regards, Arnout > + > config BR2_ARCH_IS_64 > bool > > @@ -324,3 +326,5 @@ endif > if BR2_xtensa > source "arch/Config.in.xtensa" > endif > + > +endmenu # Target options > -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F