From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnout Vandecappelle Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:56:26 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] initrd isn't needed for iso9660 when initramfs is used In-Reply-To: <1377148166-21030-1-git-send-email-shmuelzon@gmail.com> References: <1377148166-21030-1-git-send-email-shmuelzon@gmail.com> Message-ID: <5215A80A.9070006@mind.be> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 22/08/13 07:09, Assaf Inbal wrote: > I'm not entirely sure of this patch. > The problem is that, while initrd isn't needed when initramfs is used, the > default menu for grub always includes the initrd directive and will fail to load > when it's missing. Why do you want to use iso9660 with an initramfs? initramfs is only really useful for boat loaders that have a problem with passing an initrd, e.g. network boot. Regards, Arnout > Perhaps we should have two grub menus? Or create it during build? > Any ideas? > > Thanks, > Assaf > _______________________________________________ > buildroot mailing list > buildroot at busybox.net > http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/buildroot > -- Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500 Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F