Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] python-setuptools: Add patch to prevent detecting the host installation
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:18:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5215D75E.5080301@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGm1_ktgXAkpBOQJ4JspAfWKirqQg2SdKOvYH9+on2wKKgHOFw@mail.gmail.com>

On 22/08/13 11:07, Yegor Yefremov wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 10:19 AM, Yegor Yefremov
> <yegorslists@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:49 PM, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:
>>> On 20/08/13 16:25, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Markos Chandras <markos.chandras@imgtec.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>    ...etuptools-do-not-detect-installed-version.patch | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>>    1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>>>    create mode 100644 package/python-setuptools/python-setuptools-do-not-detect-installed-version.patch
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/package/python-setuptools/python-setuptools-do-not-detect-installed-version.patch b/package/python-setuptools/python-setuptools-do-not-detect-installed-version.patch
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..ebc8830
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/package/python-setuptools/python-setuptools-do-not-detect-installed-version.patch
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
>>>> +Prevent build system from detecting an existing installation.
>>>> +Fixes the following problem when python-setuptools is installed
>>>> +on the host:
>>>> +
>>>> +Setuptools installation detected at /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages
>>>> +Renaming /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools-0.9.8-py2.7.egg-info to
>>>> +/usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/setuptools-0.9.8-py2.7.egg-info.OLD.1377005697.88
>>>> +OSError: [Errno 13] Permission denied
>>>
>>>   This happens because setuptools is called with:
>>>
>>>          PYTHONPATH="/usr/lib/python$(PYTHON_VERSION_MAJOR)/site-packages"
>>>
>>>   Yegor, Gustavo, any idea why this is called with a python path pointing
>>> to the host? Maybe this isn't needed anymore? A quick grep in the source
>>> doesn't indicate an obvious place where PYTHONPATH would be relevant
>>> during install itself.
>>>
>>>   I've just tried removing the PYTHONPATH override and it built OK, but I
>>> haven't tested if a package installed with setuptools actually works.
>>> Well, actually, host-setuptools _doesn't_ have that strange
>>> PYTHONPATH override and that is of course the only one used within
>>> buildroot itself...
>>
>> I'll look into it. But I need some time.
>
> The only package, that relies on setuptools is netifaces. I've applied
> the patch, rebuilt BR and everything seems to be OK. I can use
> netifaces, when I start the new image.

  With "the patch", do you the original patch that removes something from 
setuptools.py, or do you mean that you removed the PYTHONPATH overrides 
from python-setuptools.mk?

  In the former case, yes it will work because that part is indeed 
redundant in our context.

  In the latter case: actually I think python-netifaces incorrectly 
selects BR2_PACKAGE_PYTHON_SETUPTOOLS, because AFAICS it doesn't use it 
at runtime.

  The way to test setuptools on the target is probably to run 
easy_install for some packages.


  Regards,
  Arnout


-- 
Arnout Vandecappelle                          arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect            +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind                                http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium           BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint:  7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-08-22  9:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-20 14:25 [Buildroot] [PATCH] python-setuptools: Add patch to prevent detecting the host installation Markos Chandras
2013-08-21 20:49 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-08-22  8:19   ` Yegor Yefremov
2013-08-22  9:07     ` Yegor Yefremov
2013-08-22  9:17       ` Markos Chandras
2013-08-22  9:21         ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-08-22  9:18       ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-08-22 10:36         ` Yegor Yefremov
2013-08-22 11:12           ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-08-22 11:17             ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-08-22 11:24               ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-08-22 20:33                 ` Markos Chandras
2013-08-22 20:37                   ` Arnout Vandecappelle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5215D75E.5080301@mind.be \
    --to=arnout@mind.be \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox