Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] eglibc: defaults to SSP
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:53:54 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5217BDD2.1020806@zacarias.com.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130823210931.4f2323fc@skate>

On 08/23/2013 04:09 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:

>>  config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_USE_SSP
>>  	bool "Enable stack protection support"
>> +	depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_EGLIBC
>>  	help
>>  	  Enable stack smashing protection support using GCCs
>>  	  -fstack-protector-all option.
> 
> I'm jumping on this as I was looking in a bit more details at the SSP
> support. It seems that GCC itself has a libssp library, and some
> external toolchains (such as the Linaro one) has a libssp.so that is
> apparently provided by GCC, while usually the SSP symbols
> (__stack_chk_fail and al.) are provided by the C library.
> 
> Currently BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_USE_SSP is a toolchain option of the
> Buildroot internal backend. But what if I want to use SSP support with
> an external toolchain? You made this symbol depend
> on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_EGLIBC, but BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_USE_SSP
> is also used to add the -fstack-protector-all to the CFLAGS when
> compiling all packages, which is also useful when eglibc is used, no?
> 
> Thanks for your insights,

Hi.
This patch was never applied since it's wrong (hence i ditched it from
patchwork).
We need to build with -fstack-protector-all even for eglibc.
Eglibc (at least the version we ship for internal toolchain) defaults to
support/build stack protection support on so the option is valid.
We don't have glibc support (yet - pending on your patches) but AFAIK
for modern-ish versions of glibc that's also the case.
For external toolchains, well, there's varying support i take it
depeding on toolchain component versions.
libssp wouldn't normally be necessary for modern toolchains except for
MAYBE compatibility reasons which i don't think we should care about
(old blobby apps linked against libssp) or if the toolchain has old
components so libssp shouldn't necessarily be copied, at least not as a
default.
Doing the nasty trick with sourcery 2013.05 ARM (qemu_arm_versatile)
with BR2_TARGET_OPTIMIZATION="-fstack-protector-all" works fine for
example without the need for tweaks.
Regards.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-23 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-27 14:32 [Buildroot] [PATCH] eglibc: defaults to SSP Gustavo Zacarias
2013-08-23 19:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-23 19:53   ` Gustavo Zacarias [this message]
2013-08-25  9:11     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-25 11:59       ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-08-26 22:03         ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5217BDD2.1020806@zacarias.com.ar \
    --to=gustavo@zacarias.com.ar \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox