From: Gustavo Zacarias <gustavo@zacarias.com.ar>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH] eglibc: defaults to SSP
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:53:54 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5217BDD2.1020806@zacarias.com.ar> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130823210931.4f2323fc@skate>
On 08/23/2013 04:09 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>> config BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_USE_SSP
>> bool "Enable stack protection support"
>> + depends on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_EGLIBC
>> help
>> Enable stack smashing protection support using GCCs
>> -fstack-protector-all option.
>
> I'm jumping on this as I was looking in a bit more details at the SSP
> support. It seems that GCC itself has a libssp library, and some
> external toolchains (such as the Linaro one) has a libssp.so that is
> apparently provided by GCC, while usually the SSP symbols
> (__stack_chk_fail and al.) are provided by the C library.
>
> Currently BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_USE_SSP is a toolchain option of the
> Buildroot internal backend. But what if I want to use SSP support with
> an external toolchain? You made this symbol depend
> on !BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_EGLIBC, but BR2_TOOLCHAIN_BUILDROOT_USE_SSP
> is also used to add the -fstack-protector-all to the CFLAGS when
> compiling all packages, which is also useful when eglibc is used, no?
>
> Thanks for your insights,
Hi.
This patch was never applied since it's wrong (hence i ditched it from
patchwork).
We need to build with -fstack-protector-all even for eglibc.
Eglibc (at least the version we ship for internal toolchain) defaults to
support/build stack protection support on so the option is valid.
We don't have glibc support (yet - pending on your patches) but AFAIK
for modern-ish versions of glibc that's also the case.
For external toolchains, well, there's varying support i take it
depeding on toolchain component versions.
libssp wouldn't normally be necessary for modern toolchains except for
MAYBE compatibility reasons which i don't think we should care about
(old blobby apps linked against libssp) or if the toolchain has old
components so libssp shouldn't necessarily be copied, at least not as a
default.
Doing the nasty trick with sourcery 2013.05 ARM (qemu_arm_versatile)
with BR2_TARGET_OPTIMIZATION="-fstack-protector-all" works fine for
example without the need for tweaks.
Regards.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-23 19:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-27 14:32 [Buildroot] [PATCH] eglibc: defaults to SSP Gustavo Zacarias
2013-08-23 19:09 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-23 19:53 ` Gustavo Zacarias [this message]
2013-08-25 9:11 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-08-25 11:59 ` Gustavo Zacarias
2013-08-26 22:03 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5217BDD2.1020806@zacarias.com.ar \
--to=gustavo@zacarias.com.ar \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox