From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Zacarias Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2013 08:24:18 -0300 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 12/12] toolchain: improve mudflap support In-Reply-To: <20130829095623.75c46268@skate> References: <1377671731-28656-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1377671731-28656-13-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <521EE7C3.3050003@mind.be> <20130829095623.75c46268@skate> Message-ID: <521F2F62.5050403@zacarias.com.ar> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net On 08/29/2013 04:56 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >> I would drop the option to enable -fmudflap globally, but keep the >> option to build mudflap support in the internal toolchain. As you wrote >> in another mail, mudflap is a debugging tool and not really a hardening >> tool like SSP. > > I also agree with this. Gustavo, are you fine with this? +1 we really don't want to make a Kconfig option out of each possible compiler flag and, well, busybox doesn't behave with it which many targets will use. Regards.