From: Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] python-pyzmq: new package
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2013 17:55:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5224B4DB.6060903@mind.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LW=8rf6ScMS0t95f2cDWT4sLxYnMZAnzCYoEQzPVtkKGA@mail.gmail.com>
On 09/02/13 10:24, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
[snip]
> > +define PYTHON_PYZMQ_INSTALL_TARGET_CMDS
> > + (cd $(@D); $(PYTHON_PYZMQ_PARAMS) \
> > + $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin/python setup.py install \
> > + --prefix=$(TARGET_DIR)/usr)
> > +endef
>
> Since you're using $(HOST_DIR)/usr/bin/python here, there is a dependency
> on host-python which is not explicitly expressed. Since python itself
> already depends on host-python (see package/python/python.mk
> <http://python.mk>), the dependency is implicitly satisfied.
> I check and there are some python packages that do explicitly depend on
> host-python, while others do not. It seems there is no clear strategy for
> this yet. Ideally, these things should be lined up. My view would be to
> add the explicit dependency, if the .mk file explicitly references the
> host python binary, but this may not be the view of others.
I agree that dependencies that are specific to the package itself
should be explicit, even if they are also implicit. Not just for things
explicitly mentioned in the .mk file, but also e.g. for packages that are
checked for in the configure script.
Regards,
Arnout
--
Arnout Vandecappelle arnout at mind be
Senior Embedded Software Architect +32-16-286500
Essensium/Mind http://www.mind.be
G.Geenslaan 9, 3001 Leuven, Belgium BE 872 984 063 RPR Leuven
LinkedIn profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/arnoutvandecappelle
GPG fingerprint: 7CB5 E4CC 6C2E EFD4 6E3D A754 F963 ECAB 2450 2F1F
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-02 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-01 21:33 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] knock: new package Michael Rommel
2013-09-01 21:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/3] aiccu: " Michael Rommel
2013-09-02 8:28 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-02 8:57 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-02 23:49 ` Michael Rommel
2013-09-01 21:33 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 3/3] python-pyzmq: " Michael Rommel
2013-09-02 8:24 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-02 15:55 ` Arnout Vandecappelle [this message]
2013-09-03 18:04 ` Michael Rommel
2013-09-03 21:30 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-08 12:07 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/3] knock: " Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-08 12:08 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
[not found] ` <E9670545-EE12-445D-A15C-C0C3E4A4116A@layer-7.net>
2013-09-08 14:09 ` Michael Rommel
2013-09-08 14:32 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-10 20:58 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-15 18:18 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5224B4DB.6060903@mind.be \
--to=arnout@mind.be \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox