Buildroot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [RFCv1 09/11] package: add a <pkg>_SOURCE_ADDONS variable
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 16:27:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <524595E6.4080700@lucaceresoli.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAXf6LVQ7HuAs3LLdVj1jUAmcdtZa_s5P=mrPGRA+Crr1HseDw@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
> Thomas, Arnout,
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Arnout Vandecappelle <arnout@mind.be> wrote:
>> On 16/09/13 20:31, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
>>> Dear Thomas De Schampheleire,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:39:22 +0200, Thomas De Schampheleire wrote:
>>>
>>>> What about allowing FOO_SOURCE to contain multiple words directly, and
>>>> thus not introducing a new variable? The package infrastructure can
>>>> download each word of FOO_SOURCE, but only extract (and otherwise use)
>>>> the first one. Any subsequent word has to be handled by the package
>>>> itself.
>>>
>>> The problem is that the default extract step needs to know what to do.
>>> And what it does today is that it extracts the tarball whose name is
>>> given in FOO_SOURCE. If we put several words in FOO_SOURCE, then what
>>> should be the semantic of the default extract commands? Extract the
>>> first one? All of them?
>>>
>>> That's why I've decided to go with another variable, which really means
>>> "I want this stuff to be downloaded, but don't do anything with it, the
>>> package recipe will take care of it".
>>>
>>> Of course, I'm open to changing the semantic of FOO_SOURCE instead, we
>>> would just need to define what this new semantic should be.
>>
>>   I'm more in favour of the <pkg>_SOURCE_ADDONS proposal. I think having
>> multiple _SOURCE files would be confusing.
> Ok, fair enough.
> I think you should add this to the documentation, then.

I also think keeping things separate is the best option to avoid confusion.
But to make it even more clear, I would name the variable _EXTRA_DOWNLOADS.

-- 
Luca

  reply	other threads:[~2013-09-27 14:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-09-05 21:27 [Buildroot] [RFCv1 00/11] Convert toolchain backends to packages to fix source/external-deps/legal-info Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 01/11] Makefile: make $(BUILD_DIR)/.root rule idempotent Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-08 12:06   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-08 13:13   ` Danomi Manchego
2013-09-08 13:30     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-08 16:59       ` Danomi Manchego
2013-09-08 17:31         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-09  8:54   ` Luca Ceresoli
2013-09-09 21:38   ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-09-10  7:23     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 02/11] toolchain-crosstool-ng: remove support Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-06  9:35   ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-09-06 15:53   ` Yann E. MORIN
2013-09-06 15:56     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-08 12:52   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-13 16:10   ` Luca Ceresoli
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 03/11] toolchain-external: make ext-tool.mk includable in all cases Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-08 15:31   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 04/11] toolchain: move helpers.mk into toolchain-external/ Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-08 17:50   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-13 16:07   ` Luca Ceresoli
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 05/11] toolchain: introduce a virtual package Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-13 16:24   ` Luca Ceresoli
2013-09-15 14:27   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 06/11] toolchain-buildroot: convert to the package infrastructure Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-15 14:30   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 07/11] toolchain: intermediate .mk files no longer needed Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-15 14:33   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 08/11] package: package-based implementation of source, external-deps and legal-info Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-15 19:29   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-15 20:09     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-16  1:21       ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 09/11] package: add a <pkg>_SOURCE_ADDONS variable Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-16 13:39   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-16 18:31     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-16 19:20       ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-09-17  7:21         ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-27 14:27           ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 10/11] toolchain-external: convert to the package infrastructure Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-16 13:29   ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-27 14:21     ` Luca Ceresoli
2013-09-27 14:24   ` Luca Ceresoli
2013-09-05 21:27 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 11/11] dependencies: remove useless targets Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-06  8:28 ` [Buildroot] [RFCv1 00/11] Convert toolchain backends to packages to fix source/external-deps/legal-info Fabio Porcedda
2013-09-06  8:38   ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-09-06  8:50     ` Fabio Porcedda
2013-09-06 12:37   ` Ryan Barnett
2013-09-06  8:57 ` Jérôme Pouiller
2013-09-06  9:05   ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=524595E6.4080700@lucaceresoli.net \
    --to=luca@lucaceresoli.net \
    --cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox