From: Jerzy Grzegorek <jerzy.grzegorek@trzebnica.net>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package: fix github download URL
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:24:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <524ABEFA.8080804@trzebnica.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <524AAA6D.8000103@mind.be>
Hi Arnout,
Thanks for the feedback.
> On 09/26/13 13:43, Jerzy Grzegorek wrote:
>> diff --git a/package/cpuload/cpuload.mk b/package/cpuload/cpuload.mk
>> index e0b8ccf..d00c3a4 100644
>> --- a/package/cpuload/cpuload.mk
>> +++ b/package/cpuload/cpuload.mk
>> @@ -4,8 +4,8 @@
>> #
>> ################################################################################
>>
>> -CPULOAD_VERSION = v0.3
>> -CPULOAD_SITE
>> =http://github.com/kelvincheung/cpuload/tarball/$(CPULOAD_VERSION)
>> +CPULOAD_SITE
>> =https://github.com/kelvincheung/cpuload/tarball/v$(CPULOAD_VERSION)
>> CPULOAD_LICENSE = GPLv2
>
> Not that it's a big deal to me, but I don't agree with the concept of
> this change. The meaning of this URL is that you export a certain tag
> from a git repository. It is conceptually not the same as a release
> tarball that a project creates. Therefore, I think the VERSION should
> be exactly the same as the tag name, so that it stays as close as
> possible as what we would have if we used the git site method.
>
Take into account that if tag has prefix, BR generates tarball with
weird name.
For instance for libcec:
tag: libcec-2.1.1
LIBCEC_VERSION = libcec-2.1.1
LIBCEC_SITE =
https://github.com/Pulse-Eight/libcec/tarball/$(LIBCEC_VERSION)
tarball name downloaded by BR: libcec-libcec-2.1.1.tar.gz
but when
LIBCEC_VERSION = 2.1.1
LIBCEC_SITE =
https://github.com/Pulse-Eight/libcec/tarball/libcec-$(LIBCEC_VERSION)
the tarball name generated by github matches the one from BR:
libcec-2.1.1.tar.gz
Additionally there are a few packages in BR with that approach,
e.g. civetweb, mongrel2, sqlcipher
Regards,
Jerzy
>
> Also you change the URL to https here. With the recent problems with
> https URLs that we've seen on the autobuilders recently, I wonder if
> this is a good idea?
>
>
> Regards,
> Arnout
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-01 12:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-26 11:43 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/1] package: fix github download URL Jerzy Grzegorek
2013-09-27 7:30 ` Thomas De Schampheleire
2013-09-27 8:45 ` Jerzy Grzegorek
2013-10-01 10:56 ` Arnout Vandecappelle
2013-10-01 12:24 ` Jerzy Grzegorek [this message]
2013-10-01 18:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-10-02 9:48 ` Jerzy Grzegorek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=524ABEFA.8080804@trzebnica.net \
--to=jerzy.grzegorek@trzebnica.net \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox